Roberts v. Priest

979 S.W.2d 453, 335 Ark. 137, 1998 Ark. LEXIS 598
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Roberts v. Priest. Read the opinion of the Court — 334 Ark. 503
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided November 12, 1998·No. 98-1052·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Presently pending in this matter is the obligation to pay the costs of the master’s fact-finding and the cost of the court reporter for transcription of the three-day hearing conducted by the master. The master, the Honorable Jack L. Lessenberry, was appointed as a fact-finder by per curiam order of this court dated September 11, 1998. See Roberts v. Priest, 334 Ark. 244, 973 S.W.2d 797 (1998). On that same date, we required petitioner’s counsel and intervenor’s counsel each to post a bond for costs in the amount of $1,000. Id. Pursuant to Ark. Sup. Ct. Rule 6-5, which deals with an original action and the costs incurred by a master’s taking of evidence, we have held that the master’s hearing and the transcript of it are for the mutual benefit of the parties. See Bailey v. McCuen, 319 Ark. 369, 370, 891 S.W.2d 797 (1995). Accordingly, we hold that the real parties in interest, the petitioner and the intervenor, shall share equally the obligation of costs. The respondent, Sharon Priest, Secretary of State, is not subject to payment of costs because of sovereign immunity. Id. at 369. After being credited with the $1,000 bond amount for their share of the $4,682.50 master’s bill and the $2,788.50 reporter’s bill, petitioner is directed to pay $2,735.50 into the registry of this court. Likewise, the intervenor is directed to pay $2,735.50 into the registry of this court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roberts v. Priest, 979 S.W.2d 453, 335 Ark. 137, 1998 Ark. LEXIS 598 (Ark. 1998).

979 S.W.2d 453 (Roberts v. Priest) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bailey v. McCuen
891 S.W.2d 797 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1995)
Roberts v. Priest
973 S.W.2d 797 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1998)