Roberts v. Pike
13 N.Y.S. 559, 19 N.Y. Civ. Proc. R. 422, 1890 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3237
Opinion
The offer to refer claim may be by paroi. Lanning v. Swarts, 9 How. Pr. 434. Proof of refusal to refer is substantially uncontradicted, and this entitles plaintiff to'costs as a matter of right. Rooney v. Lenmon, 3 Law Bull. 101; Snyder v. Snyder, 26 Hun, 324. Accordingly, certificate of right to costs and an additional allowance of $100.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Roberts v. Pike, 13 N.Y.S. 559, 19 N.Y. Civ. Proc. R. 422, 1890 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3237 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1890).
13 N.Y.S. 559 (Roberts v. Pike) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Roberts v. Pike
14 N.Y.S. 957 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1891)