Roberts v. Pike
13 N.Y.S. 559, 19 N.Y. Civ. Proc. R. 422, 1890 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3237
This text of 13 N.Y.S. 559 (Roberts v. Pike) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Roberts v. Pike, 13 N.Y.S. 559, 19 N.Y. Civ. Proc. R. 422, 1890 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3237 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1890).
Opinion
The offer to refer claim may be by paroi. Lanning v. Swarts, 9 How. Pr. 434. Proof of refusal to refer is substantially uncontradicted, and this entitles plaintiff to'costs as a matter of right. Rooney v. Lenmon, 3 Law Bull. 101; Snyder v. Snyder, 26 Hun, 324. Accordingly, certificate of right to costs and an additional allowance of $100.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Roberts v. Pike
14 N.Y.S. 957 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1891)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
13 N.Y.S. 559, 19 N.Y. Civ. Proc. R. 422, 1890 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3237, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roberts-v-pike-nyctcompl-1890.