Roberts v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.
97 A. 1028, 253 Pa. 126, 1916 Pa. LEXIS 797
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMarch 20, 1916
DocketAppeal, No. 381
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 97 A. 1028 (Roberts v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Roberts v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co., 97 A. 1028, 253 Pa. 126, 1916 Pa. LEXIS 797 (Pa. 1916).
Opinion
The only assignments of error which are in compliance [127]*127with our rules relate to the charge of the court, and the only complaint of counsel for appellant in their brief argument is of it, but, as no special or general exception was taken to it, the assignments cannot be considered: Foley v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co., 240 Pa. 169.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Vierling v. Fry
46 A.2d 473 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1946)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
97 A. 1028, 253 Pa. 126, 1916 Pa. LEXIS 797, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roberts-v-philadelphia-rapid-transit-co-pa-1916.