Roberts v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.
97 A. 1028, 253 Pa. 126, 1916 Pa. LEXIS 797
Opinion
The only assignments of error which are in compliance [127]*127with our rules relate to the charge of the court, and the only complaint of counsel for appellant in their brief argument is of it, but, as no special or general exception was taken to it, the assignments cannot be considered: Foley v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co., 240 Pa. 169.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Roberts v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co., 97 A. 1028, 253 Pa. 126, 1916 Pa. LEXIS 797 (Pa. 1916).
97 A. 1028 (Roberts v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Vierling v. Fry
46 A.2d 473 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1946)