Roberts v. Patton

18 Mo. 485
CourtSupreme Court of Missouri
DecidedOctober 15, 1853
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 18 Mo. 485 (Roberts v. Patton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roberts v. Patton, 18 Mo. 485 (Mo. 1853).

Opinion

Scott, Judge.

In a suit pending between Roberts and others against Stoner, the object of which was to compel Stoner to give security for the forthcoming of slaves, in which he held a life estate, in right of his wife, when the plaintiff’s right to them should vest in possession, Wm. N. Patton, claiming to have purchased some of the slaves from Stoner, came in and asked to be made a eo-defendant, producing his bill of sale in support of his motion. This the court refused. Upon this he sued out this writ of error. ’ This writ must be dismissed, as the record shows that there is no final judgment in the case. If Patton had rights, those rights could not be affected by a suit to which he was no party. But, indeed, we see no reason why the court did not let him come in, for if the case was as he made it, he should certainly' have been ruled to give secui’ity. See Roberts v. Stoner, ante. The writ of error herein, is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Beechwood v. Joplin-Pittsburg Railway Co.
158 S.W. 868 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
18 Mo. 485, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roberts-v-patton-mo-1853.