Roberts v. Ozmint
This text of 213 F. App'x 190 (Roberts v. Ozmint) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Tyree Alphonso Roberts, a/k/a Abdiyyah ben Alkebulanyahh, appeals the district court’s order accepting the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Roberts v. Ozmint, No. 6:05-cv02324-MBS, 2006 WL 2303183 (D.S.C. Aug. 8, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
213 F. App'x 190, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roberts-v-ozmint-ca4-2007.