Roberts v. National Bank

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Roberts v. National Bank

73 S.E. 407, 10 Ga. App. 272, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 455

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 15, 1912

Docket3336, 3337

StatusPublished

This text of 73 S.E. 407 (Roberts v. National Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Roberts v. National Bank, 73 S.E. 407, 10 Ga. App. 272, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 455 (Ga. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

Powell, J.

While in particular facts these cases differ somewhat from the case of Hansford v. National Bank of Tifton, in general principle they are covered by it. In these cases the prosecution was for cheating and swindling, whereas in that case it was for carrying concealed weapons. Both of these offenses are simply violations of penal laws, of this State, with the enforcement of which national banks have no concern whatever.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Powell, J.

While in particular facts these cases differ somewhat from the case of Hansford v. National Bank of Tifton, in general principle they are covered by it. In these cases the prosecution was for cheating and swindling, whereas in that case it was for carrying concealed weapons. Both of these offenses are simply violations of penal laws, of this State, with the enforcement of which national banks have no concern whatever.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

73 S.E. 407, 10 Ga. App. 272, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 455, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roberts-v-national-bank-gactapp-1912.