Roberts v. McKenzie Co.

Fourth Circuit

Roberts v. McKenzie Co.

596 F. App'x 249

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 11, 2015·No. No. 14-7412·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Brandon Roberts appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion for relief from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have re[250] viewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Roberts v. McKenzie, No. 8:12-cv-02474-DKC (D.Md. Aug. 18, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Brandon Roberts appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion for relief from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have re[250] viewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Roberts v. McKenzie, No. 8:12-cv-02474-DKC (D.Md. Aug. 18, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Roberts v. McKenzie Co., 596 F. App'x 249 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

596 F. App'x 249 (Roberts v. McKenzie Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related