Roberts v. McKenzie

Fourth Circuit

Roberts v. McKenzie

566 F. App'x 226

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 15, 2014·No. No. 13-7194·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Brandon Roberts appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Roberts v. McKenzie, No. 8:12-cv-02474-AW, 2013 WL 3179102 (D.Md. June 20, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Brandon Roberts appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Roberts v. McKenzie, No. 8:12-cv-02474-AW, 2013 WL 3179102 (D.Md. June 20, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Roberts v. McKenzie, 566 F. App'x 226 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

566 F. App'x 226 (Roberts v. McKenzie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related