Home/N.D. Ohio/Roberts v. MAHONING COUNTY

Roberts v. MAHONING COUNTY

495 F. Supp. 2d 712, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96942, 2006 WL 4606650
District Court, N.D. Ohio·Decided August 2, 2006·No. 4:03 CV 2329·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Before the Court is the motion to intervene filed by the City of Youngstown pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3626(a)(3)(F). (Doc. No. 207). The motion is granted.

Counsel for the City of Youngstown is directed to file the Complaint in Intervention which was attached to the motion, 1 *713 taking care to use the event “Intervenor’s Complaint” when making this electronic filing.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

1

. Counsel should also be sure to file a clean copy, not the one currently attached to the motion, which contains an automatic header labeling it as Doc. No. 207-3. The ECF system will attached a new header once the new document is filed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roberts v. MAHONING COUNTY, 495 F. Supp. 2d 712, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96942, 2006 WL 4606650 (N.D. Ohio 2006).

495 F. Supp. 2d 712 (Roberts v. MAHONING COUNTY) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Roberts v. Mahoning County
495 F. Supp. 2d 719 (N.D. Ohio, 2007)