Roberts v. Larsen

48 N.E.2d 318, 290 N.Y. 186, 1943 N.Y. LEXIS 1128
New York Court of Appeals·Decided March 11, 1943·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

*188 Per Curiam.

The motions for dismissal of the cause of action for breach of the covenant against encumbrances were properly denied in view of the undisputed proof of actual encroachments tending to establish that cause of action. Consequently the exceptions of the defendants to the denial of these motions are not sufficient to raise the question whether breach of such a covenant can be predicated on the necessity for repairs or alterations to conform a structure to building laws, and we express no opinion thereon.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Finch, Rippey, Lewis, Conway and Desmond, JJ., concur.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roberts v. Larsen, 48 N.E.2d 318, 290 N.Y. 186, 1943 N.Y. LEXIS 1128 (N.Y. 1943).

48 N.E.2d 318 (Roberts v. Larsen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kaloumenos v. Bottaccio
273 A.D. 907 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1948)