Roberts v. Knight

48 Me. 171
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided July 1, 1859·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was drawn up by

Davis, J.

The only question presented by the pleadings is this — can a writ of scire facias be lawfully issued against one who has been adjudged a trustee, before the return day of the execution against the principal defendant ?

[172]*172In this case, a demand was duly made upon the defendant, and the execution returned before the writ of scire facias was sued out. But, the return day of the execution did not occur until February 14th, 1858; and the writ was issued December 29th, 1857.

Before such a writ can be sued out, the statute requires, that the “execution be returned unsatisfied.” R. S., c. 86, § 67. Until that is done, it is uncertain whether it may not be satisfied by the principal defendant. Nor can this uncertainty be removed until the return day of the execution. If, in fact, returned before, it may be re-issued; as it is only when the officer has' used the power conferred by the process during the whole time given to him that he can return it unsatisfied, within the meaning of the statute. Adams v. Cummiskey, 4 Cush., 420.

Demurrer sustained;• — Declaration adjudged bad;

Judgment for the defendant.

Tenney, C. J., Rice, Appleton, Goodenow and Kent, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roberts v. Knight, 48 Me. 171 (Me. 1859).

48 Me. 171 (Roberts v. Knight) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Curtis v. Morton
97 A. 803 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1916)
Himmelberger-Harrison Lumber Co. v. McCabe
119 S.W. 357 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1909)
Grant v. New York Life Insurance Co.
51 A. 1050 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1902)
Marks v. Hardy
86 Mo. 232 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1885)
Knight v. Frost
14 Mo. App. 331 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1883)