Roberts v. Kelly
This text of 2 Hall 307 (Roberts v. Kelly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The Court gave judgment for the plaintiff on the demurrer, upon the ground that the rejoinder was a departure from the plea. They held also, that the replication was defective for duplicity, but that this defect, being one of form merely, could not be noticed except upon a special" demurrer,—as the rule, that the court will give judgment against the first defect in pleading, applies to defects is substance only.
[E. Paine, Att’y for the plff. R. S. Church, Att’y for the deft.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 Hall 307, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roberts-v-kelly-nysuperctnyc-1829.