Roberts v. Jenkins
52 A.D. 491, 65 N.Y.S. 385
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 15, 1900·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
The order denying a motion for a preference of this cause upon the calendar must be affirmed. The pleadings in the action are not in the record, nor is there anything from which we are able to determine that the plaintiff is entitled to the statutory preference claimed. That right cannot be inferred simply from the title of an action.
The order must be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
. Present—Van Brunt, P. J., Rumsey, Patterson, Ingraham and McLaughlin, JJ.
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Roberts v. Jenkins, 52 A.D. 491, 65 N.Y.S. 385 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1900).
52 A.D. 491 (Roberts v. Jenkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Dooley v. Paget
38 Misc. 44 (New York Supreme Court, 1902)
Marando v. T. A. Gillespie Co.
54 A.D. 488 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1900)