Roberts v. Jenkins

52 A.D. 491, 65 N.Y.S. 385
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 15, 1900
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 52 A.D. 491 (Roberts v. Jenkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roberts v. Jenkins, 52 A.D. 491, 65 N.Y.S. 385 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1900).

Opinion

Per Curiam :

The order denying a motion for a preference of this cause upon the calendar must be affirmed. The pleadings in the action are not in the record, nor is there anything from which we are able to determine that the plaintiff is entitled to the statutory preference claimed. That right cannot be inferred simply from the title of an action.

The order must be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

. Present—Van Brunt, P. J., Rumsey, Patterson, Ingraham and McLaughlin, JJ.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dooley v. Paget
38 Misc. 44 (New York Supreme Court, 1902)
Marando v. T. A. Gillespie Co.
54 A.D. 488 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1900)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
52 A.D. 491, 65 N.Y.S. 385, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roberts-v-jenkins-nyappdiv-1900.