Roberts v. Hoyt
This text of 12 Iowa 345 (Roberts v. Hoyt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This cause was affirmed at the June Term, 1861, without a formal opinion. An application for a rehearing has since been made, and the same is now overruled upon the following ground: — ■
The case was submitted to the court below without the intervention of a jury. Upon all the testimony which is reported to this court, the finding was for plaintiff. The facts were not found, however; nor was there any motion for a new trial. Upon the authority of Warner v. Pace, 10 Iowa 391 and Corner & Co. v. Gaston, Ib. 512, we can not review the finding.
Petition overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
12 Iowa 345, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roberts-v-hoyt-iowa-1861.