Roberts v. Hershiser

20 Neb. 594
CourtNebraska Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 15, 1886
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 20 Neb. 594 (Roberts v. Hershiser) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roberts v. Hershiser, 20 Neb. 594 (Neb. 1886).

Opinion

Maxwell, Ch. J.

This action was brought in the district court of Holt county, to compel the plaintiff in error, who was then county judge, to issue an execution upon a judgment pre[595]*595viously rendered in the county court of said county. The ■district court rendered judgment granting the writ from which the plaintiff brings the cause into this court by petition in error. There is no bill of exceptions in this case It is therefore impossible for this court to review the action of the trial court. It is evident that testimony was introduced on the hearing, but whether or not the evidence warranted the judgment actually rendered we have no means 'of determining.

The judgment is therefore affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

The other judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Appelget v. McWhinney
59 N.W. 918 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1894)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
20 Neb. 594, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roberts-v-hershiser-neb-1886.