Roberts v. Gress
This text of 89 S.E. 196 (Roberts v. Gress) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The grounds of the motion for a new trial complaining of the exclusion of evidence offered by the defendant at the trial are without merit, in view of the rulings-made,in the case of Gress v. Roberts, 139 Ga. 795 (78 S. E. 120).
2. Under the rulings in the same case there was no substantial error in the portions of the charge complained of. Mere verbal inaccuracies in some of the expressions used will not require the grant of a new trial.
3. The decision in the case before referred to, being a decision in this case, states the law of the case, and can not be reviewed and modified.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
89 S.E. 196, 145 Ga. 329, 1916 Ga. LEXIS 303, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roberts-v-gress-ga-1916.