Roberts v. Great Northern Ry. Co.

Ninth Circuit

Roberts v. Great Northern Ry. Co.

138 F. 711, 71 C.C.A. 127, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 3820

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedMay 1, 1905

DocketNo. 1,145

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 138 F. 711 (Roberts v. Great Northern Ry. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Roberts v. Great Northern Ry. Co., 138 F. 711, 71 C.C.A. 127, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 3820 (9th Cir. 1905).

Pincite

Opinion

ROSS, Circuit Judge.

This was an action at law brought for the recovery of damages for alleged personal injuries, and the alleged errors of the court below are sought to be brought here for review by means of an appeal. It has been many times decided that an appeal is not the appropriate method for the review of errors alleged to have been committed in an action at law. The motion of the appellee for the dismissal of the appeal must be granted.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ROSS, Circuit Judge.

This was an action at law brought for the recovery of damages for alleged personal injuries, and the alleged errors of the court below are sought to be brought here for review by means of an appeal. It has been many times decided that an appeal is not the appropriate method for the review of errors alleged to have been committed in an action at law. The motion of the appellee for the dismissal of the appeal must be granted.

Appeal dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

138 F. 711, 71 C.C.A. 127, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 3820, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roberts-v-great-northern-ry-co-ca9-1905.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack