Roberts v. Great Northern Ry. Co.

Ninth Circuit

Roberts v. Great Northern Ry. Co.

138 F. 711, 71 C.C.A. 127, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 3820

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided May 1, 1905·No. No. 1,145·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ROSS, Circuit Judge.

This was an action at law brought for the recovery of damages for alleged personal injuries, and the alleged errors of the court below are sought to be brought here for review by means of an appeal. It has been many times decided that an appeal is not the appropriate method for the review of errors alleged to have been committed in an action at law. The motion of the appellee for the dismissal of the appeal must be granted.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ROSS, Circuit Judge.

This was an action at law brought for the recovery of damages for alleged personal injuries, and the alleged errors of the court below are sought to be brought here for review by means of an appeal. It has been many times decided that an appeal is not the appropriate method for the review of errors alleged to have been committed in an action at law. The motion of the appellee for the dismissal of the appeal must be granted.

Appeal dismissed.

Roberts v. Great Northern Ry. Co., 138 F. 711, 71 C.C.A. 127, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 3820 (9th Cir. 1905).

Pincite

138 F. 711 (Roberts v. Great Northern Ry. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related