Roberts v. General Electric Company

768 N.E.2d 1127, 97 N.Y.2d 737, 742 N.Y.S.2d 188, 2002 N.Y. LEXIS 494
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 19, 2002
StatusPublished
Cited by36 cases

This text of 768 N.E.2d 1127 (Roberts v. General Electric Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roberts v. General Electric Company, 768 N.E.2d 1127, 97 N.Y.2d 737, 742 N.Y.S.2d 188, 2002 N.Y. LEXIS 494 (N.Y. 2002).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The judgment appealed from and the order of the Appellate Division brought up for review should be reversed, with costs, and the Labor Law § 240 (1) cause of action dismissed.

This is an action brought pursuant to Labor Law § 240 (1). Plaintiff, an employee of an asbestos removal company, was injured when a piece of asbestos, which had been cut and deliberately dropped from a chemical tank approximately 12 feet above ground, fell on him. Plaintiff and his wife brought this action against General Electric Company, the owner of the premises, alleging, among other things, absolute liability under section 240 (1) of the Labor Law. Supreme Court granted partial summary judgment to plaintiffs as to liability on the section 240 (1) cause of action. The Appellate Division affirmed, with two Justices dissenting. Defendant now appeals as of right to this Court pursuant to CPLR 5601 (d) from the ensuing Supreme Court judgment awarding damages to bring up for review the prior Appellate Division order.

Here, the asbestos “that fell on plaintiff was not a material being hoisted or a load that required securing for the purposes of the undertaking at the time it fell, and thus Labor Law § 240 (1) does not apply. * * * This was not a situation where a hoisting or securing device of the kind enumerated in the statute would have been necessary or even expected” (Narducci v Manhasset Bay Assoc., 96 NY2d 259, 268 [2001]). Accordingly, there was no basis for liability pursuant to Labor Law §240 (1).

Judges Smith, Levine, Ciparick, Wesley, Rosenblatt and Graffeo concur in memorandum; Chief Judge Kaye taking no part.

Judgment appealed from and order of the Appellate Division brought up for review reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

James v. Marini Homes, LLC
2025 NY Slip Op 00132 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)
Flores v. Fort Green Homes, LLC
2024 NY Slip Op 02303 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)
Vicki v. City of Niagara Falls
189 N.Y.S.3d 332 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)
Albuquerque v. City of New York
2020 NY Slip Op 06696 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
Crichigno v. Pacific Park 550 Vanderbilt, LLC
2020 NY Slip Op 4533 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
Carlton v. City of New York
2018 NY Slip Op 3500 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
Romero v. 2200 Northern Steel, LLC
2017 NY Slip Op 2075 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Sarata v. Metropolitan Transportation Authority
134 A.D.3d 1089 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
Podobedov v. East Coast Construction Group, Inc.
133 A.D.3d 733 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
GAFFNEY, PATRICK v. NORAMPAC INDUSTRIES, INC.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013
Gaffney v. Norampac Industries, Inc.
109 A.D.3d 1210 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
Moncayo v. Curtis Partition Corp.
106 A.D.3d 963 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
Banscher v. Actus Lend Lease, LLC
103 A.D.3d 823 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
Sung Kyu-To v. Triangle Equities
84 A.D.3d 1058 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
La Veglia v. St. Francis Hospital
78 A.D.3d 1123 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Solano v. City of New York
77 A.D.3d 571 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Fried v. Always Green, LLC
77 A.D.3d 788 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Harinarain v. Walker
73 A.D.3d 701 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Buckley v. Columbia Grammar & Preparatory
44 A.D.3d 263 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Boyle v. 42nd Street Development Project, Inc.
38 A.D.3d 404 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
768 N.E.2d 1127, 97 N.Y.2d 737, 742 N.Y.S.2d 188, 2002 N.Y. LEXIS 494, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roberts-v-general-electric-company-ny-2002.