Roberts v. Frisby

38 Tex. 219
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1873
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 38 Tex. 219 (Roberts v. Frisby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roberts v. Frisby, 38 Tex. 219 (Tex. 1873).

Opinion

Walker, J.

I do not know how far a husband would be morally bound by a postnuptial contract in which he hires his wife to live with him ; but the legal obligation cannot be recognized in this court. Roberts sues Frisby on a note calling for $1500, which upon its face is a good note ; but the evidence shows that the note was intended to compromise a difficulty between Frisby and his wife r that he owed her nothing ; that Roberts is her brother, and that the note was for the use of the wife; that if anybody has a right to it, it is his wife, who, though living apart from him, is still his lawful wife. We do not think there is anything in the errors assigned in this case.

The judgment is therefore affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Campbell v. Prater
191 P.2d 160 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1948)
Estate of Kesler
22 A. 892 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1891)
Merrill v. Peaslee
16 N.E. 271 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1888)
French v. Grenet
57 Tex. 273 (Texas Supreme Court, 1881)
Stone v. Heirs of Crawford
1 Posey 605 (Texas Commission of Appeals, 1880)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
38 Tex. 219, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roberts-v-frisby-tex-1873.