Roberts v. First National Bank of Jamestown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Roberts v. First National Bank of Jamestown

254 A.D. 824, 5 N.Y.S.2d 217, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7787

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 27, 1938

StatusPublished

This text of 254 A.D. 824 (Roberts v. First National Bank of Jamestown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Roberts v. First National Bank of Jamestown, 254 A.D. 824, 5 N.Y.S.2d 217, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7787 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, in so far as it denies defendant Cawcroft’s motion for an examination of Roy G. Roberts, reversed on the law and the facts and motion granted directing the examination of said Roberts as to those matters set forth in paragraph numbered 16th of the amended answer of defendant Cawcroft relating to the ownership of the stock therein referred to and the source of the funds by which such stock was acquired, and otherwise affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. The said examination of Roy G. Roberts shall be held at the City Hall, Jamestown, N. Y., on June 7, 1938, at ten a. m., before Walter H. Edson, Esq., an attorney and counselor at law, who is designated for that purpose.> All concur. (The order denies a motion to examine a witness before trial in an action for conversion.) Present — Lewis, Cunningham, Taylor and Dowling, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, in so far as it denies defendant Cawcroft’s motion for an examination of Roy G. Roberts, reversed on the law and the facts and motion granted directing the examination of said Roberts as to those matters set forth in paragraph numbered 16th of the amended answer of defendant Cawcroft relating to the ownership of the stock therein referred to and the source of the funds by which such stock was acquired, and otherwise affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. The said examination of Roy G. Roberts shall be held at the City Hall, Jamestown, N. Y., on June 7, 1938, at ten a. m., before Walter H. Edson, Esq., an attorney and counselor at law, who is designated for that purpose.> All concur. (The order denies a motion to examine a witness before trial in an action for conversion.) Present — Lewis, Cunningham, Taylor and Dowling, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

254 A.D. 824, 5 N.Y.S.2d 217, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7787, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roberts-v-first-national-bank-of-jamestown-nyappdiv-1938.