Roberts v. Ellis
This text of 279 A.D. 597 (Roberts v. Ellis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In our opinion the papers submitted on the motion do not establish plaintiff’s indigence. The facts alleged in the moving papers are not sufficient to justify preference in the trial of this cause over those of other litigants awaiting trial, and, hence, the granting of the motion was an improvident exercise of discretion. (O’Callaghan v. Brawley, 276 App. Div. 908; Thomas v. Green Bus Lines, 276 App. Div. 922; Keeler v. Greene, 273 App. Div. 976; Lavicka v. National Transp. Co., 264 App. Div. 785; Braver v. Davis, 277 App. Div. 879.) Carswell, Acting P. J., Adel, Sneed, Wenzel and MaeCrate, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
279 A.D. 597, 107 N.Y.S.2d 272, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3139, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roberts-v-ellis-nyappdiv-1951.