Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Roberts v. Cunningham

Roberts v. Cunningham

181 A.D.2d 515
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 12, 1992
StatusPublished

This text of 181 A.D.2d 515 (Roberts v. Cunningham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roberts v. Cunningham, 181 A.D.2d 515 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

— Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Beatrice Shainswit, J.), entered on November 22, 1991, unanimously affirmed for the reasons stated by Beatrice Shainswit, J., with costs. Motion by defendant-appellant to find plaintiff-respondent in contempt is denied. Motion by plaintiff-respondent to vacate stay is granted. No opinion. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Wallach, Kassal and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
181 A.D.2d 515, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roberts-v-cunningham-nyappdiv-1992.