Roberts v. COUNTY OF MAHONING, OHIO

N.D. Ohio

Roberts v. COUNTY OF MAHONING, OHIO

495 F. Supp. 2d 693, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45335, 2005 WL 5569488

CourtDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio

DecidedMarch 28, 2005

Docket4:03 CV 2329

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 495 F. Supp. 2d 693 (Roberts v. COUNTY OF MAHONING, OHIO) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. Ohio primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Roberts v. COUNTY OF MAHONING, OHIO, 495 F. Supp. 2d 693, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45335, 2005 WL 5569488 (N.D. Ohio 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER APPOINTING SPECIAL MASTER

DOWD, District Judge.

On March 10, 2005, this Court issued its Memorandum Opinion, including Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, determining that conditions at the Mahoning County Jail violate the constitutional rights of the plaintiff class. See Doc. No. 93, 2005 WL 5569487, 495 F.Supp.2d 670.

The Court also found that the remedial phase of this litigation will be “sufficiently complex to warrant the appointment of a Special Master consistent with the provisions of 18 U.S.C. § 3626(f).” Id. at *20, 495 F.Supp.2d at 692. The Court asked the attorneys to engage in the process outlined in the statute for suggesting appropriate persons for possible appointment. This process is now complete. Both sides and the Court are in agreement as to an appropriate appointee.

Accordingly, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3626(f)(2)(C), the Court hereby appoints Vincent M. Nathan to serve as Special Master for the remedial phase of this litigation. Compensation for Mr. Nathan shall be governed by 18 U.S.C. § 3626(f)(4).

The Court requests that Mr. Nathan provide the Court with a preliminary interim report by April 15, 2005.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI