Roberts v. Commissioner of Social Security

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio
DecidedFebruary 2, 2023
Docket3:21-cv-00204
StatusUnknown

This text of Roberts v. Commissioner of Social Security (Roberts v. Commissioner of Social Security) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Ohio primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roberts v. Commissioner of Social Security, (S.D. Ohio 2023).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AMBER ROBERTS, ; Plaintiff, : Vs. : Civil Action No.: 3:21-cv-204 COMMISSIONER OF : SOCIAL SECURITY, : Defendant. : ORDER This cause coming before the Court on the joint motion of the parties, due notice having been given, and the Court being fully advised, IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. The Parties’ Joint Stipulation for an Award of Attorney’s Fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act is accepted and the Commissioner shall pay Plaintiff's attorney fees in the amount of $7,300 and court costs in the amount of $402.00; 2. Counsel for the parties shall verify whether or not Plaintiff owes a preexisting debt to the United States subject to offset, consistent with Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521, 560 U.S. 586 (2010). If no such pre-existing debt exists, Defendant shall pay the EAJA award directly to Plaintiff's counsel pursuant to the EAJA assignment signed by Plaintiff and counsel: and 3. The case remains terminated on the docket of this Court. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: 2- %AF23 Entered: [ [Mae Nd for.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Astrue v. Ratliff
560 U.S. 586 (Supreme Court, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Roberts v. Commissioner of Social Security, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roberts-v-commissioner-of-social-security-ohsd-2023.