Roberts v. City of Orange
133 A. 418, 102 N.J.L. 721, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 237
Opinion
The judgment under review will be-affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the foregoing opinion.
For affirmance — Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Roberts v. City of Orange, 133 A. 418, 102 N.J.L. 721, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 237 (N.J. 1926).
133 A. 418 (Roberts v. City of Orange) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McEvoy v. Mayor and Council of Cliffside Park
199 A.2d 397 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1964)
De Marco v. BD., CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS, BERGEN CTY.
115 A.2d 635 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1955)
Sganga v. Township of Teaneck
32 A.2d 505 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1943)