Roberts v. City of Orange
133 A. 418, 102 N.J.L. 721, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 237
This text of 133 A. 418 (Roberts v. City of Orange) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Roberts v. City of Orange, 133 A. 418, 102 N.J.L. 721, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 237 (N.J. 1926).
Opinion
The judgment under review will be-affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the foregoing opinion.
For affirmance — Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
McEvoy v. Mayor and Council of Cliffside Park
199 A.2d 397 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1964)
De Marco v. BD., CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS, BERGEN CTY.
115 A.2d 635 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1955)
Sganga v. Township of Teaneck
32 A.2d 505 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1943)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
133 A. 418, 102 N.J.L. 721, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 237, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roberts-v-city-of-orange-nj-1926.