Roberts v. Chew

402 S.E.2d 770, 198 Ga. App. 653, 1991 Ga. App. LEXIS 234
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 21, 1991
DocketA90A1968, A90A1969
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 402 S.E.2d 770 (Roberts v. Chew) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roberts v. Chew, 402 S.E.2d 770, 198 Ga. App. 653, 1991 Ga. App. LEXIS 234 (Ga. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

McMurray, Presiding Judge.

The Probate Court of Macon County, Georgia, entered separate orders granting guardianship fees to William T. Roberts from the estates of Estelle Walker and Edgar M. Walker. The probate court awarded the guardianship fees based on Roberts’ relinquishment of the wards’ assets to their respective estates. Walter S. Chew, Jr., as the Executor of the Estate of Estelle Walker and as the Administrator of the Estate of Edgar M. Walker, filed appeals to the superior court and the awards were reversed. William T. Roberts then filed direct appeals. Held:

As compensation for services, a guardian shall receive a commission on “all sums paid out by him, either for- debts, legacies, or distributive shares.” OCGA § 53-6-140 (a). However, no such commission shall be paid for handing over trust assets to a successor fiduciary. OCGA §§ 53-6-142; 29-2-43. In the cases sub judice, the superior court did not err in reversing the probate court’s awards to Roberts for transferring trust assets to the Walkers’ respective estates.

Judgments affirmed.

Carley, J., concurs. Sognier, C. J., concurs in the judgment only.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Estate of Donald
474 S.E.2d 251 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
402 S.E.2d 770, 198 Ga. App. 653, 1991 Ga. App. LEXIS 234, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roberts-v-chew-gactapp-1991.