Roberts v. Chandler

1916 OK 268, 155 P. 1118, 56 Okla. 474, 1916 Okla. LEXIS 732
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedFebruary 29, 1916
Docket6403
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 1916 OK 268 (Roberts v. Chandler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roberts v. Chandler, 1916 OK 268, 155 P. 1118, 56 Okla. 474, 1916 Okla. LEXIS 732 (Okla. 1916).

Opinion

Opinion by

BRETT, C.

This action was commenced in the county court of Pontotoc county by the plaintiff in error, against the defendant in error, to recover judgment for rents on certain lands described in the petition, and also for damages for the wrongful detention of said lands. A trial was had, which resulted in a judgment for the defendant. The plaintiff appeals from this judgment.

The defendant has filed no brief, and assigns no reason' for his failure to do so. We have examined the record and brief of plaintiff in error, and find his contention is reasonably supported by his brief; and we will not, therefore, seek a theory upon which the judgment may be affirmed.

We therefore recommend that the judgment be reversed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hoehler v. Short
1914 OK 120 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1914)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1916 OK 268, 155 P. 1118, 56 Okla. 474, 1916 Okla. LEXIS 732, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roberts-v-chandler-okla-1916.