Roberts v. Carroll
94 S.E. 583, 21 Ga. App. 464, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 639
This text of 94 S.E. 583 (Roberts v. Carroll) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Roberts v. Carroll, 94 S.E. 583, 21 Ga. App. 464, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 639 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).
Opinion
The only question presented for review is as to the sufficiency of evidence to authorize the verdict. There being some evidence to authorize the verdict, and the trial judge having approved the finding of ■ the jury, it was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
94 S.E. 583, 21 Ga. App. 464, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 639, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roberts-v-carroll-gactapp-1917.