Roberts v. Canington

2 Hall 649
CourtThe Superior Court of New York City
DecidedDecember 15, 1829
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 2 Hall 649 (Roberts v. Canington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roberts v. Canington, 2 Hall 649 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1829).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff is entitled, by the express- words of the act, to a joint and several bond from the defendant, who transfers a cause commenced against him. in a state court, into the Circuit Court of the United States. Even although a Court of Equity might interpose, and furnish a remedy in some form to-the plantiff if required, yet he is entitled to a perfect security,, and an adequate remedy at lato, against each of the obligors. He is not bound to take a mere equitable lien, and the court cannot accept it. The petition and motion in this case must therefore be denied.

Mr. Lord then offered to file the security required by the statute, and give a joint and several bond for the defendant.

It is too late. The bond must be filed at the time pointed out in the act.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fisk v. Union Pacific Railroad
10 Abb. Pr. 457 (S.D. New York, 1871)
Hazard v. Durant
9 R.I. 602 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1868)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Hall 649, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roberts-v-canington-nysuperctnyc-1829.