Roberts v. Brown

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Roberts v. Brown

496 S.E.2d 494, 230 Ga. App. 522

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 30, 1998

DocketA97A2214

StatusPublished

This text of 496 S.E.2d 494 (Roberts v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Roberts v. Brown, 496 S.E.2d 494, 230 Ga. App. 522 (Ga. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

Andrews, Chief Judge.

Roberts and Core appeal from the dismissal of their 42 USC § 1983 claim against the city of West Point and three of its police officers, including Brown, resulting from a search claimed to be illegal.

The complaint was dismissed, based on the statute of limitation, pursuant to the defendants’ motion. For two reasons, we affirm.

1. First, plaintiffs filed no response to the motion below, and we do not consider arguments made here for the first time. Cornelius v. Wood, 223 Ga. App. 339, 341 (1) (477 SE2d 595) (1996).

2. Second, even if we were to consider the argument made, the issue has been determined adversely to plaintiffs. Doe #102 v. Dept. of Corrections, 268 Ga. 582, 583 (2) (492 SE2d 516) (1997); Day v. Brown, 207 Ga. App. 134, 135 (1) (427 SE2d 104) (1993).

3. Because there is no reasonable basis upon which appellants could conclude this appeal had merit, a penalty of $500 will be imposed by the trial court upon receipt of the remittitur, pursuant to Court of Appeals Rule 15 (b).

Judgment affirmed with direction.

Johnson and Blackburn, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI