Roberts v. Barlowe

132 S.E.2d 483, 260 N.C. 239, 1963 N.C. LEXIS 676
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided September 25, 1963·No. 166·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

PeR Cubiam.

Proceedings for partition are equitable in nature, and in a suit for partition a court of equity has power to adjust all equities between the parties with respect to the property to be partitioned. A sale for partition may be ordered and the rights of the parties adjusted from the proceeds of the sale. Henson v. Henson, 236 N.C. 429, 72 S.E. 2d 873. See also 14 Am. Jur., Cotenancy, ss. 43-46, pp. 109-113; 68 C.J.S., Partition, a 136, pp. 212, 213.

Since the court below made no order affecting the distribution o-f the proceeds of the sale, the judgment directing a sale of the lands and appointing a commissioner will not be held erroneous. But the male defendant, having asserted his claims before an order of distribution was made, is entitled as a matter of right to have his claims determined before an order of distribution of the proceeds of the sale is entered. Lewis, Ex Parte, 42 N.C. 4.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roberts v. Barlowe, 132 S.E.2d 483, 260 N.C. 239, 1963 N.C. LEXIS 676 (N.C. 1963).

132 S.E.2d 483 (Roberts v. Barlowe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tarr v. Zalaznik
826 S.E.2d 245 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2019)
Cleary v. Leden
365 S.E.2d 903 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1988)
Wall v. Wall
212 S.E.2d 238 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1975)
Kayann Properties, Inc. v. Cox
149 S.E.2d 553 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1966)
Allen v. Allen
139 S.E.2d 585 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1965)
Lucas v. Felder
134 S.E.2d 154 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1964)