Roberts v. Astrue
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-1467
JOSEPH M. ROBERTS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (9:07-cv-03417-HMH)
Submitted: May 24, 2010 Decided: June 14, 2010
Before WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robertson H. Wendt, Jr., LAW OFFICES OF ROBERTSON WENDT, North Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellant. W. Walter Wilkins, United States Attorney, Marvin J. Caughman, Assistant United States Attorney, Michael A. Thomas, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Donna L. Calvert, Acting Regional Chief Counsel, Gary Sultz, Assistant Regional Counsel, Sandra T. Krider, Assistant Regional Counsel, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Office of the General Counsel, Denver, Colorado, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2 PER CURIAM:
Joseph M. Roberts appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
affirming the Commissioner’s decision denying Roberts’
applications for disability insurance benefits and supplemental
security income. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Roberts v. Astrue, No. 9:07-cv-03417-HMH
(D.S.C. Feb. 20, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Roberts v. Astrue (Roberts v. Astrue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.