Roberts, Sheldon v. State
Opinion
AFFIRM; Opinion issued April 5, 2013
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-11-01712-CR
SHELDON DAMON ROBERTS, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 283rd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F04-73256-T
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright and Justices Myers and Evans Opinion by Chief Justice Wright
A jury convicted Sheldon Damon Roberts of capital murder, and the trial court assessed
punishment at life imprisonment. See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 19.03(a)(7) (West Supp. 2012).
The Sixth District Court of Appeals 1 affirmed the conviction and sentence, but the Court of
Criminal Appeals reversed the judgment as to capital murder, affirmed the conviction for the
lesser-included offense of murder, and remanded to the trial court for assessment of punishment.
See Roberts v. State, No. 06-05-00165-CR, 2007 WL 1702771 (Tex. App.—Texarkana June 14,
1 The appeal of the original conviction was transferred from this Court to the Sixth District Court of Appeals pursuant to a docket equalization order. 2007), rev’d, 273 S.W.3d 322 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008). After a hearing on remand, the trial court
assessed punishment at life imprisonment. On appeal, appellant’s attorney filed a brief in which
she concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the
requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional
evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See
High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a
copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response, but he
did not file a pro se response.
We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824,
827 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (explaining appellate court’s duty in Anders cases). We agree the
appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support
the appeal.
We affirm the trial court’s judgment.
/Carolyn Wright/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE
Do Not Publish TEX. R. APP. P. 47 111712F.U05
-2- Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
SHELDON DAMON ROBERTS, Appeal from the 283rd Judicial District Appellant Court of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. F04-73256-T). No. 05-11-01712-CR V. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright, Justices Myers and Evans participating. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
Judgment entered April 5, 2013.
-3-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Roberts, Sheldon v. State (Roberts, Sheldon v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.