Roberts Roofing Co. v. Smith

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Roberts Roofing Co. v. Smith

605 So. 2d 167, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 9863, 1992 WL 222004

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 15, 1992

DocketNo. 92-598

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 605 So. 2d 167 (Roberts Roofing Co. v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Roberts Roofing Co. v. Smith, 605 So. 2d 167, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 9863, 1992 WL 222004 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial judge’s findings of fact in a nonjury trial will not be disturbed where they are supported by competent and substantial evidence even if that evidence is disputed. Antun Invests. Corp. v. Ergas, 549 So.2d 706 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Ren-Del Enters., Inc. v. Florida Keys First State Bank, 539 So.2d 541 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Laufer v. Norma Fashions, Inc., 418 So.2d 437 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). Competent and substantial evidence was presented that the appellant breached the roof repair contract and, for that reason, was not entitled to a judgment of foreclosure on its mechanic’s lien.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The trial judge’s findings of fact in a nonjury trial will not be disturbed where they are supported by competent and substantial evidence even if that evidence is disputed. Antun Invests. Corp. v. Ergas, 549 So.2d 706 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Ren-Del Enters., Inc. v. Florida Keys First State Bank, 539 So.2d 541 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Laufer v. Norma Fashions, Inc., 418 So.2d 437 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). Competent and substantial evidence was presented that the appellant breached the roof repair contract and, for that reason, was not entitled to a judgment of foreclosure on its mechanic’s lien.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

605 So. 2d 167, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 9863, 1992 WL 222004, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roberts-roofing-co-v-smith-fladistctapp-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack