Roberts, Reilly & Sons, Inc. v. United States

56 Cust. Ct. 669, 1966 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2000
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedMarch 22, 1966
DocketR.D. 11156; Entry No. 514001
StatusPublished

This text of 56 Cust. Ct. 669 (Roberts, Reilly & Sons, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roberts, Reilly & Sons, Inc. v. United States, 56 Cust. Ct. 669, 1966 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2000 (cusc 1966).

Opinion

Wilson, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the respective parties herein:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, subject to the approval of the court, as follows:
(1) That the involved merchandise consists of 6-Amino Penicil-lanic Acid entered for consumption after the effective date of the Customs Simplification Act of 1956; that the said merchandise is not identified on the Final List published by the Secretary of the Treasury pursuant thereto (T.D. 54521) and is accordingly subject to reappraisement under section 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended by the said Customs Simplification Act.
(2) That the involved merchandise was appraised under the basis of the American selling price of a similar competitive article manufactured or produced in the United States, as such American selling price is defined in section 402(e) of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended; that neither party challenges this basis of appraisement.
(3) That on or about the date of exportation, the price at which a similar competitive article manufactured or produced in the United [670]*670States was freely sold or offered for sale for domestic consumption in the principal market of the United States, in the ordinary course of trade and in the usual wholesale quantities, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other expenses incidental to placing the article in condition packed ready for delivery, was $150 per kilo less 1 percent, net, packed.
(4) That the above-entitled appeal may be submitted for decision upon this stipulation, the same being limited to the merchandise described hereinabove and abandoned in all other respects.

On the agreed facts, I find and hold American selling price, as that value is defined in section 402 (e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here in question and that such value was $150 per kilo, less 1 percent, net, packed.

Judgment will issue accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
56 Cust. Ct. 669, 1966 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2000, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roberts-reilly-sons-inc-v-united-states-cusc-1966.