ROBERTS, JAMES v. OUTHOUSE, ROBERT
Opinion
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
754 CA 11-00207 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, GREEN, AND GORSKI, JJ.
JAMES M. ROBERTS, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
V ORDER
ROBERT OUTHOUSE, SHERIFF OF COUNTY OF CAYUGA AND COUNTY OF CAYUGA, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
THE LAW FIRM OF FRANK W. MILLER, EAST SYRACUSE (FRANK W. MILLER OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
SUGARMAN LAW FIRM, LLP, SYRACUSE (AMY M. VANDERLYKE OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Cayuga County (Mark H. Fandrich, A.J.), entered December 6, 2010. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied the motion of defendants for summary judgment and to preclude plaintiff’s expert testimony.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Entered: June 10, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
ROBERTS, JAMES v. OUTHOUSE, ROBERT (ROBERTS, JAMES v. OUTHOUSE, ROBERT) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.