Home/Supreme Court of New Jersey/Roberts-Horsfield v. Gedicks

Roberts-Horsfield v. Gedicks

124 A. 925, 96 N.J. Eq. 384, 11 Stock. 384, 1924 N.J. LEXIS 442
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedApril 25, 1924
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 124 A. 925 (Roberts-Horsfield v. Gedicks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roberts-Horsfield v. Gedicks, 124 A. 925, 96 N.J. Eq. 384, 11 Stock. 384, 1924 N.J. LEXIS 442 (N.J. 1924).

Opinion

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Backes.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, VAN BUSKIRK, CLARK, McGLENNON — 13.

For reversal — None.

*Page 385

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stewart v. Damron
160 P.2d 321 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1945)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
124 A. 925, 96 N.J. Eq. 384, 11 Stock. 384, 1924 N.J. LEXIS 442, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roberts-horsfield-v-gedicks-nj-1924.