Roberts-Horsfield v. Gedicks

124 A. 925, 96 N.J. Eq. 384, 11 Stock. 384, 1924 N.J. LEXIS 442
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided April 25, 1924·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Backes.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, VAN BUSKIRK, CLARK, McGLENNON — 13.

For reversal — None.

*Page 385

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roberts-Horsfield v. Gedicks, 124 A. 925, 96 N.J. Eq. 384, 11 Stock. 384, 1924 N.J. LEXIS 442 (N.J. 1924).

124 A. 925 (Roberts-Horsfield v. Gedicks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stewart v. Damron
160 P.2d 321 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1945)