Roberts-Horsfield v. Gedicks
124 A. 925, 96 N.J. Eq. 384, 11 Stock. 384, 1924 N.J. LEXIS 442
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Backes.
For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, VAN BUSKIRK, CLARK, McGLENNON — 13.
*Page 385For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Roberts-Horsfield v. Gedicks, 124 A. 925, 96 N.J. Eq. 384, 11 Stock. 384, 1924 N.J. LEXIS 442 (N.J. 1924).
124 A. 925 (Roberts-Horsfield v. Gedicks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Stewart v. Damron
160 P.2d 321 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1945)