Roberts-Gordon Appliance Corp. v. M. Parisi & Son Construction Co.

96 A.D.2d 719, 465 N.Y.S.2d 90, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19284

This text of 96 A.D.2d 719 (Roberts-Gordon Appliance Corp. v. M. Parisi & Son Construction Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roberts-Gordon Appliance Corp. v. M. Parisi & Son Construction Co., 96 A.D.2d 719, 465 N.Y.S.2d 90, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19284 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Opinion

— Order and judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: Plaintiff’s documentary and other proof demonstrated its entitlement to summary judgment. It then became defendant’s burden to demonstrate by admissible evidence the existence of a factual issue requiring a trial (see Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557). Defendant failed to do so and Special Term properly granted summary judgment. The affidavit submitted by defendant’s employee contains nonspecific and conclusory averments which do not refute the documentary proof submitted by plaintiff. (Appeal from order and judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Cook, J. — summary judgment.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Hancock, Jr., Doerr, Boomer and Moule, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Zuckerman v. City of New York
404 N.E.2d 718 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
96 A.D.2d 719, 465 N.Y.S.2d 90, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19284, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roberts-gordon-appliance-corp-v-m-parisi-son-construction-co-nyappdiv-1983.