Roberts ex rel. Drusko v. Abrunzo

604 So. 2d 564, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 9244, 1992 WL 206416
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 28, 1992·No. Nos. 91-01376, 91-02014·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

BLUE, Judge.

John M. Roberts, a minor, and his mother Rhonda Y. Drusko (collectively referred to as Roberts), appeal the summary judgment and the cost judgment entered against them in favor of Metropolitan General Hospital, Inc. in this medical malpractice case. [565] The eodefendant, Thomas J. Abrunzo, M.D., is not a party to this appeal.

Roberts contends the court should have allowed the late-filing of an affidavit of a medical expert to supplement a previous and timely filed affidavit of another medical expert. The trial court may permit affidavits to be supplemented by further affidavits pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.510(e). See Stephens v. Dichtenmueller, 216 So.2d 448 (Fla.1968). Under the particular facts of this case we hold the court abused its discretion in refusing to permit the filing of the supplemental affidavit. We reverse and remand to allow the filing of the supplemental affidavit and to reconsider the summary judgment and final judgment for costs.

Reversed and remanded.

SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and PATTERSON, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roberts ex rel. Drusko v. Abrunzo, 604 So. 2d 564, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 9244, 1992 WL 206416 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

604 So. 2d 564 (Roberts ex rel. Drusko v. Abrunzo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Department of Revenue ex rel. Crane v. Fackler
843 So. 2d 994 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)