Roberto Tapia v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 25, 2025·No. 3D2025-0746·Published

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed June 25, 2025. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D25-0746 Lower Tribunal No. F93-10747B ________________

Roberto Tapia, Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida, Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, William Altfield, Judge.

Roberto Tapia, in proper person.

James Uthmeier, Attorney General, and Magaly Rodriguez, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before LOGUE, C.J., and SCALES, and LOBREE, JJ.

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Ratliff v. State, 914 So. 2d 938, 940 (Fla. 2005) (“The

fact that the judicial system has no way of knowing how long the defendant

will live and therefore cannot know how long the defendant will be

incarcerated does not render a life sentence unconstitutionally indefinite. It

is abundantly clear that the Legislature, by prescribing a sentence of life

imprisonment, intends that the defendant remain in prison for the rest of his

life. The term ‘life’ is sufficiently definite so that it can be understood and

applied. There is nothing indefinite about such a sentence.”) (citations

omitted).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roberto Tapia v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2025).

Roberto Tapia v. State of Florida (Roberto Tapia v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ratliff v. State
914 So. 2d 938 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2005)