Roberto Tapia v. State of Florida
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed June 25, 2025. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D25-0746 Lower Tribunal No. F93-10747B ________________
Roberto Tapia, Appellant,
vs.
The State of Florida, Appellee.
An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, William Altfield, Judge.
Roberto Tapia, in proper person.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, and Magaly Rodriguez, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before LOGUE, C.J., and SCALES, and LOBREE, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Ratliff v. State, 914 So. 2d 938, 940 (Fla. 2005) (“The
fact that the judicial system has no way of knowing how long the defendant
will live and therefore cannot know how long the defendant will be
incarcerated does not render a life sentence unconstitutionally indefinite. It
is abundantly clear that the Legislature, by prescribing a sentence of life
imprisonment, intends that the defendant remain in prison for the rest of his
life. The term ‘life’ is sufficiently definite so that it can be understood and
applied. There is nothing indefinite about such a sentence.”) (citations
omitted).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Roberto Tapia v. State of Florida (Roberto Tapia v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.