Roberto Somoza v. Ramon Lavado Martinez

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 17, 2024
Docket2024-0344
StatusPublished

This text of Roberto Somoza v. Ramon Lavado Martinez (Roberto Somoza v. Ramon Lavado Martinez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roberto Somoza v. Ramon Lavado Martinez, (Fla. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed April 17, 2024.

________________

No. 3D24-344 Lower Tribunal No. 24-30525 CC ________________

Roberto Somoza, Appellant,

vs.

Ramon Lavado Martinez, Appellee.

An Appeal from a non-final order from the County Court for Miami- Dade County, Lissette De La Rosa, Judge.

Wolfe Law Miami, P.A., and Richard C. Wolfe, for appellant.

Legal Armor the People’s Law Firm, and Alian M. Perez, for appellee.

Before EMAS, GORDO and BOKOR, JJ.

GORDO, J.

ON CONFESSION OF ERROR Roberto Somoza (“Somoza”) appeals an order granting Ramon

Lavado Martinez’s (“Martinez”) verified emergency motion for temporary

injunction. Based on Martinez’s commendable and appropriate confession

of error, we reverse the defective order under review, which lacks the

requisite findings to justify entry of a temporary injunction, and remand for

further proceedings. See Allied Universal Corp. v. Given, 223 So. 3d 1040,

1042 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017) (“To grant a temporary injunction, the moving

party must plead and establish: (1) a likelihood of irreparable harm and the

unavailability of an adequate remedy at law; (2) a substantial likelihood of

success on the merits; (3) that the threatened injury to the petitioner

outweighs any possible harm to the respondent; and (4) that the granting of

a temporary injunction will not disserve the public interest.”); Angelino v.

Santa Barbara Enters., LLC, 2 So. 3d 1100, 1103 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009) (“The

entry of a temporary injunction, however, will not stand unless the trial

courts makes specific findings in support of each and every element

required for the entry of the injunction. Florida Rule of Civil Procedure

1.610 sets forth the form and scope requirements for the entry of a

temporary injunction. Every temporary injunction must specify the reasons

for its entry, and it must describe in reasonable detail the act or acts to be

restrained.”).

2 Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Angelino v. Santa Barbara Enterprises, LLC
2 So. 3d 1100 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
Allied Universal Corp. v. Given
223 So. 3d 1040 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Roberto Somoza v. Ramon Lavado Martinez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roberto-somoza-v-ramon-lavado-martinez-fladistctapp-2024.