Roberto Rodriguez v. State of Florida

182 So. 3d 854, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 218
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 6, 2016·No. 4D13-1403·Published

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

ROBERTO RODRIGUEZ,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D13-1403

[ January 6, 2016 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Martin J. Bidwill, Judge; L.T. Case No. 10014135CF10A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Narine N. Austin, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Heidi L. Bettendorf, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Broughton v. State, 790 So. 2d 1118, 1118–19 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001) (holding that the standard instruction informing the jury that it was “the judge’s job to determine a proper sentence” was not misleading even though the State sought to have the defendant designated as a prison releasee reoffender).

CIKLIN, C.J., TAYLOR and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roberto Rodriguez v. State of Florida, 182 So. 3d 854, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 218 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

182 So. 3d 854 (Roberto Rodriguez v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Broughton v. State
790 So. 2d 1118 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)