ROBERTO RODRIGUES v. NAEIF RAYDAN
This text of ROBERTO RODRIGUES v. NAEIF RAYDAN (ROBERTO RODRIGUES v. NAEIF RAYDAN) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
ROBERTO RODRIGUES, Appellant,
v.
NAEIF RAYDAN, Individually, JUDY WADE, Individually, SHARON W. FAASSEN, Individually, and ROLAND W. FAASSEN, Individually, Appellees.
No. 4D18-2934
[October 24, 2019]
Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Jeffrey R. Levenson, Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE-15- 009874(09).
Adam Richardson of Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A., West Palm Beach, and Cam F. Justice and Adam D. Breit of Justice Law, Plantation, for appellant.
Alexandra Valdes and Scott A. Cole of Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A., Miami, for appellees Sharon W. Faassen and Roland W. Faassen.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
LEVINE, C.J., CONNER and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
ROBERTO RODRIGUES v. NAEIF RAYDAN, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roberto-rodrigues-v-naeif-raydan-fladistctapp-2019.