Roberto Martinez v. State of Florida
This text of Roberto Martinez v. State of Florida (Roberto Martinez v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed January 14, 2026. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D25-1564 Lower Tribunal No. F86-23726B ________________
Roberto Martinez, Appellant,
vs.
State of Florida, Appellee.
An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Tanya Brinkley, Judge.
Roberto Martinez, in proper person.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, and David Llanes, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before MILLER, LOBREE, and BOKOR, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Ratliff v. State, 914 So. 2d 938, 940 (Fla. 2005) (“[T]he
Legislature, by prescribing a sentence of life imprisonment, intends that the
defendant remain in prison for the rest of his life. The term ‘life’ is sufficiently
definite so that it can be understood and applied. See State v. Wershow, 343
So. 2d 605 (Fla. 1977). There is nothing indefinite about such a sentence.”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Roberto Martinez v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roberto-martinez-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2026.