Roberto Gil v. the State of Florida
This text of Roberto Gil v. the State of Florida (Roberto Gil v. the State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed June 11, 2025. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D22-1265 Lower Tribunal No. F12-21329C ________________
Roberto Gil, Appellant,
vs.
The State of Florida, Appellee.
An Appeal conducted pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Richard Hersch, Judge.
Roberto Gil, in proper person.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, and Linda Katz, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before LOGUE, C.J., and LINDSEY and GORDO, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Roberto Gil appeals the denial of his timely-filed motion for
postconviction relief. We have reviewed the trial court’s meticulous treatment
of the Appellant’s claims, which included an opportunity for Appellant to
supplement his pleading after the trial court found them inadequate, carefully
determining Appellant had met the first but not second prong of Strickland v.
Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984), conducting evidentiary hearings on
certain points where appropriate, preparing a scholarly and insightful
seventeen-page order setting forth its reasoning and fact-findings, granting
full relief on one of Appellant’s claims and resetting that charge for trial, and
denying relief on the others. Finding no error, we affirm.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Roberto Gil v. the State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roberto-gil-v-the-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2025.