Roberto Garcia v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 5, 2007
Docket14-07-00175-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Roberto Garcia v. State (Roberto Garcia v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roberto Garcia v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed July 5, 2007

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed July 5, 2007.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-07-00167-CR &

    14-07-00175-CR

ROBERTO GARCIA, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Criminal Court at Law No. 3

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. 1411688 & 1411689

M E M O R A N D U M   O P I N I O N

After a jury trial, appellant was convicted in trial court cause number 1411688 of the offense of resisting arrest, and in trial court cause number 1411689 of the offense of criminal mischief.  On February 20, 2007, appellant was sentenced in trial court cause number 1411688 to 90 days in the Harris County Jail and assessed a fine of $2500.00.  On the same date, appellant was sentenced in trial court cause number 1411689, and the punishment assessed was a fine of $1602.00.


On May 31, 2007, this court ordered a hearing to determine why appellant, who is unrepresented by counsel, had not made financial arrangements for the filing of a reporter=s record in this appeal.  On June 21, 2007, the trial court conducted the hearing.   On June 25, 2007, supplemental clerk=s records were filed in these two causes, containing the trial judge=s findings of fact and conclusions of law.  The trial court found appellant is not indigent and has abandoned his appeals without making the necessary arrangements for paying for the records.

On the basis of those findings, this court has considered the appeal without briefs.   See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b).  The case is before us without reporter=s records or bills of exception.  We find no fundamental error.

Accordingly, the judgments of the trial court are affirmed.

PER CURIAM

Judgment rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed July 5, 2007.

Panel consists of Justices Yates, Edelman, and Seymore.

Do Not Publish C Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Roberto Garcia v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roberto-garcia-v-state-texapp-2007.