Roberto Canas Gardea v. the State of Texas
This text of Roberto Canas Gardea v. the State of Texas (Roberto Canas Gardea v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
No. 06-22-00004-CR
ROBERTO CANAS GARDEA, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 276th District Court Camp County, Texas Trial Court No. CF-20-02048
Before Morriss, C.J., Stevens and van Cleef, JJ. ORDER
Appellant Roberto Canas Gardea appeals from his conviction of indecency with a child
by sexual contact. On June 27, 2022, Gardea’s court-appointed appellate counsel filed an
Anders1 brief in this appeal, and on August 22, 2022, Gardea filed a pro se motion for access to
the appellate record for purposes of preparing a response to his counsel’s Anders brief. Gardea’s
motion for access to the appellate record is granted. Under Kelly v. State,2 we are required to
enter an order specifying the procedure to be followed to ensure Gardea’s access to that record.
Gardea’s appointed counsel informed this Court that he mailed a paper copy of the
appellate record to Gardea on August 23, 2022. On August 24, this Court forwarded a copy of
the digitally recorded exhibit that was a part of Gardea’s appellate record to prison officials at the
Texas Department of Criminal Justice’s Jordan Unit, and by copy of this
order, request that those officials afford Gardea a means of reviewing that exhibit within twenty
days of the date the exhibit is received in the Jordan Unit. Allowing fifteen days from the date of
this order for the record to be delivered to Gardea and for him to review the digitally recorded
exhibit that is part of that record and giving Gardea thirty days to prepare his pro se response, we
hereby set October 10, 2022, as the deadline for Gardea to file his pro se response to his
counsel’s Anders brief.
1 See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). 2 Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 321–22 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). 2 IT IS SO ORDERED.
BY THE COURT
DATE: August 24, 2022
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Roberto Canas Gardea v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roberto-canas-gardea-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2022.