Roberto Alejandro Rodriguez Gras v. the State of Texas

Opinion

Opinion issued February 25, 2025

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

appellant’s counsel filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, stating that appellant “d[id]

not wish to continue to prosecute the appeal,” and requested that this Court “grant

his motion to dismiss this appeal.”

Appellant and his attorney have signed the motion, and the Court has not

issued a decision. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a). Further, more than ten days have

passed, and the State has not expressed opposition to appellant’s motion. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 10.3(a)(2).

Accordingly, we reinstate the appeal to the Court’s active docket, grant

appellant’s motion, and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a), 43.2(f). We

dismiss any other pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Adams and Justices Gunn and Guiney.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Footnotes

1. NO. 01-22-00935-CR ——————————— ROBERTO ALEJANDRO RODRIGUEZ GRAS, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 230th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 1756321 MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Roberto Alejandro Rodriguez Gras, filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s December 8, 2022 final judgment. On the motion of appellant, the Court abated the appeal and remanded to the trial court to resolve an inconsistency in the record regarding appellant’s right to appeal. However, on February 12, 2025,