Robert William Chapman v. D.A. Garraghty, Warden, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections

804 F.2d 1250, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 33351, 1986 WL 16146
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 10, 1986·No. 86-6661·Unpublished

Opinion

804 F.2d 1250
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Robert William CHAPMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
D.A. GARRAGHTY, Warden, Director, Virginia Department of
Corrections, Defendants-Appellee.

No. 86-6661.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 29, 1986.
Decided Nov. 10, 1986.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert R. Merhige, Jr., District Judge. (C/A No. 85-692)

Robert William Chapman, appellant pro se.

Richard Francis Gorman, III, Office of the Attorney General, for appellees.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before RUSSELL, WIDENER and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from its order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Chapman v. Garraghty, C/A No. 85-692 (E.D.Va., June 30, 1986).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robert William Chapman v. D.A. Garraghty, Warden, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, 804 F.2d 1250, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 33351, 1986 WL 16146 (4th Cir. 1986).

804 F.2d 1250 (Robert William Chapman v. D.A. Garraghty, Warden, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Maynard v. Schmidt
804 F.2d 1250 (Fourth Circuit, 1986)