Robert Ward Sondra Williams, Individually v. Kenneth H. Shepherd Julia Rose Shepherd

45 F.3d 428, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 40407, 1994 WL 717564
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedDecember 29, 1994
Docket93-1761
StatusPublished

This text of 45 F.3d 428 (Robert Ward Sondra Williams, Individually v. Kenneth H. Shepherd Julia Rose Shepherd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Robert Ward Sondra Williams, Individually v. Kenneth H. Shepherd Julia Rose Shepherd, 45 F.3d 428, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 40407, 1994 WL 717564 (4th Cir. 1994).

Opinion

45 F.3d 428
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Robert WARD; Sondra Williams, Individually, Plaintiffs Appellants,
v.
Kenneth H. SHEPHERD; Julia Rose Shepherd, Defendants Appellees.

No. 93-1761.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 15, 1994.
Decided: Dec. 29, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA-91-3002-S)

Saul Ephraim Kerpelman, Baltimore, MD, for Appellants. Kenneth H. Shepherd, Julia Rose Shepherd, Washington, DC, Appellees Pro Se.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Robert Ward, by his mother Sondra Williams, appeals from the district court's order granting summary judgment to the Defendant in this diversity action alleging that Robert sustained permanent injury as the result of ingesting lead-based paint during the time that he and his mother resided in an apartment owned by the Defendant. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion reveals that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Ward v. Shepherd, No. CA-91-3002-S (D. Md. May 20, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
45 F.3d 428, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 40407, 1994 WL 717564, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-ward-sondra-williams-individually-v-kenneth-ca4-1994.